INTROD UCTOR Y ^

К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179  181 182 183 184 185 186 
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 
340 

 

of apple, to whatever object is of a red tint, and to everything

which has fallen from a higher to a lower level.

 

It is impossible intelligently to utter the simplest sentence

no savage could even say " Spear broken!" without making

use of highly abstract ideas. Indeed, the highest and most

abstract of all ideas, that of " being " or " existence," is neces-

sarily implied in every statement we make and every question

we ask. Again, no progress in science is possible without

apprehending degrees of likeness and unlikeness, perceptions

as to which constitute the basis of all classification. But

neither " likeness " nor " unlikeness " can, of course, exist by

itself in the concrete, and no single object taken by itself

can be either one or the other. But as with likeness, so with

every relation in which one object or action can possibly stand

to another object or action, we can only apprehend it by

means of an abstract idea, and as all science consists of a

study and comprehension of " relations," so all science is

essentially abstract although derived from, and accurately

applicable to, real concrete states of real concrete things.

 

" Thoughts " in one sense are concrete, individual mental

(or psychical) realities, as truly as a heap of stones are con-

crete physical realities. But the meaning of a thought and

its oral expression e.g., " triangle " or " apple " is (as just

said) abstract. Nevertheless, it is not purely mental, but

refers to real things which constitute the " class " to which

the abstract term refers the class of triangles and the class

of apples each real concrete member of each such class

possessing the real concrete characters referred to by the

abstract term. Thus these " thoughts " so considered are

not simply mental any more than simply physical. They

are ideas which have their roots in the real concrete

character of real concrete things. Therefore what we

mainly make use of are these activities of a mixed nature

in essence psychical and in reference, generally, physical.

 

 

of apple, to whatever object is of a red tint, and to everything

which has fallen from a higher to a lower level.

 

It is impossible intelligently to utter the simplest sentence

no savage could even say " Spear broken!" without making

use of highly abstract ideas. Indeed, the highest and most

abstract of all ideas, that of " being " or " existence," is neces-

sarily implied in every statement we make and every question

we ask. Again, no progress in science is possible without

apprehending degrees of likeness and unlikeness, perceptions

as to which constitute the basis of all classification. But

neither " likeness " nor " unlikeness " can, of course, exist by

itself in the concrete, and no single object taken by itself

can be either one or the other. But as with likeness, so with

every relation in which one object or action can possibly stand

to another object or action, we can only apprehend it by

means of an abstract idea, and as all science consists of a

study and comprehension of " relations," so all science is

essentially abstract although derived from, and accurately

applicable to, real concrete states of real concrete things.

 

" Thoughts " in one sense are concrete, individual mental

(or psychical) realities, as truly as a heap of stones are con-

crete physical realities. But the meaning of a thought and

its oral expression e.g., " triangle " or " apple " is (as just

said) abstract. Nevertheless, it is not purely mental, but

refers to real things which constitute the " class " to which

the abstract term refers the class of triangles and the class

of apples each real concrete member of each such class

possessing the real concrete characters referred to by the

abstract term. Thus these " thoughts " so considered are

not simply mental any more than simply physical. They

are ideas which have their roots in the real concrete

character of real concrete things. Therefore what we

mainly make use of are these activities of a mixed nature

in essence psychical and in reference, generally, physical.