INTROD UCTOR Y ^
К оглавлению1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135
136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152
153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169
170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 181 182 183 184 185 186
187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237
238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254
255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271
272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305
306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322
323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339
340
of apple, to whatever object is of a red tint, and to everything
which has fallen from a higher to a lower level.
It is impossible intelligently to utter the simplest sentence
no savage could even say " Spear broken!" without making
use of highly abstract ideas. Indeed, the highest and most
abstract of all ideas, that of " being " or " existence," is neces-
sarily implied in every statement we make and every question
we ask. Again, no progress in science is possible without
apprehending degrees of likeness and unlikeness, perceptions
as to which constitute the basis of all classification. But
neither " likeness " nor " unlikeness " can, of course, exist by
itself in the concrete, and no single object taken by itself
can be either one or the other. But as with likeness, so with
every relation in which one object or action can possibly stand
to another object or action, we can only apprehend it by
means of an abstract idea, and as all science consists of a
study and comprehension of " relations," so all science is
essentially abstract although derived from, and accurately
applicable to, real concrete states of real concrete things.
" Thoughts " in one sense are concrete, individual mental
(or psychical) realities, as truly as a heap of stones are con-
crete physical realities. But the meaning of a thought and
its oral expression e.g., " triangle " or " apple " is (as just
said) abstract. Nevertheless, it is not purely mental, but
refers to real things which constitute the " class " to which
the abstract term refers the class of triangles and the class
of apples each real concrete member of each such class
possessing the real concrete characters referred to by the
abstract term. Thus these " thoughts " so considered are
not simply mental any more than simply physical. They
are ideas which have their roots in the real concrete
character of real concrete things. Therefore what we
mainly make use of are these activities of a mixed nature
in essence psychical and in reference, generally, physical.
of apple, to whatever object is of a red tint, and to everything
which has fallen from a higher to a lower level.
It is impossible intelligently to utter the simplest sentence
no savage could even say " Spear broken!" without making
use of highly abstract ideas. Indeed, the highest and most
abstract of all ideas, that of " being " or " existence," is neces-
sarily implied in every statement we make and every question
we ask. Again, no progress in science is possible without
apprehending degrees of likeness and unlikeness, perceptions
as to which constitute the basis of all classification. But
neither " likeness " nor " unlikeness " can, of course, exist by
itself in the concrete, and no single object taken by itself
can be either one or the other. But as with likeness, so with
every relation in which one object or action can possibly stand
to another object or action, we can only apprehend it by
means of an abstract idea, and as all science consists of a
study and comprehension of " relations," so all science is
essentially abstract although derived from, and accurately
applicable to, real concrete states of real concrete things.
" Thoughts " in one sense are concrete, individual mental
(or psychical) realities, as truly as a heap of stones are con-
crete physical realities. But the meaning of a thought and
its oral expression e.g., " triangle " or " apple " is (as just
said) abstract. Nevertheless, it is not purely mental, but
refers to real things which constitute the " class " to which
the abstract term refers the class of triangles and the class
of apples each real concrete member of each such class
possessing the real concrete characters referred to by the
abstract term. Thus these " thoughts " so considered are
not simply mental any more than simply physical. They
are ideas which have their roots in the real concrete
character of real concrete things. Therefore what we
mainly make use of are these activities of a mixed nature
in essence psychical and in reference, generally, physical.